The Path to the Podium
Every year the MS&T panelists are forced to award lower scores to submissions that they know from experience deserve higher consideration. Why is that you ask? The short story is that these submissions have not provided the kinds of evidence that support a high score. The hard fact is that your submission is a standalone document: If you don't provide the data, you don't get the score. So, here are some points to help you craft a submission that will get a worthy subject the recognition it deserves.
Ths most important strategy of all is to treat the preparation of the submission with all the seriousness you would muster in a response to requests for information or proposal. This is a rigorous competition. The short-list of three finalists is the cream of the crop.
Review the award descriptions and submission guidelines carefully. Finalists will have excelled at addressing each criterion with examples and data.
Ensure your proposal subject is eligible, worthy, and applicable to the defense community.
Hyperbolic "smoke and mirrors" do not sway the panel. Be specific - use evidence and data to support your narrative. Panelists need enough data to make an informed opinion.
Value is a concept that is threaded throughout the awards. Be specific in describing added value, how it is generated, and how you know the magnitude of the value.
Formal evaluation and reviews provide powerful evidence of effectiveness and value.
Testimonials, while not required, are important. The presence of testimonials that support your narrative are indicative of the relationship with clients and even other contract (industry/academic) team members, and the care and effort you have put forth in preparing the submission. Relevant testimonials are awarded 1 point. One point is often the difference between an Honorable Mention and a Finalist.
If you have any questions about the awards program, please contact Holly Foster, Business Manager, holly.foster@halldale.com